
The Persistence of Orientalism: Anglo-American Historians and Modern Egypt
Caroline Stone
Peter Gran
Syracuse UP, 2020
Intended for academics with specialized interests and not for general readers, this book criticizes the tendency of American and British scholars to perceive Egypt's political system in the 19th and 20th centuries as an example of stereotyped "Oriental Despotism" and for not taking a broader view of influences and developments, a subject worth exploring. He points out—correctly—that one country's view of another is often dictated by its own political agenda, at the expense of an objective analysis of facts, and therefore the traditional view of Egypt's evolution should be reconsidered. A controversial yet perfectly valid point. The book suffers at points with repetitiveness and lengthy criticisms of scholars (Arab as well as Western) tend to be waspish rather than constructive. The most interesting chapter is perhaps that in which he exhorts greater attention to the Ottoman roots of modern Egypt. As with other Syracuse University Press publications, the volume is nicely produced.
You may also be interested in...
In War and Peace, Book Explores How Rome and Persia Remained Frenemies
Book Review: In his latest scholarly work, Roman historian Adrian Goldsworthy reduces Persian and Roman longevity to simply an ever-evolving coexistence.Editor Challenges Readers To Witness Islamic History Sans the Modern Lens In New Book
In 1516, Ottoman Sultan Selim I entered Damascus clean-shaven. What followed changed Arab-Turkish relations for 400 years.Child's Play: Reconstructing Everyday Life of Youth in Ancient Egypt
Egyptologist Amandine Marshall observes how the depictions of children created by Ancient Egyptians seldom illustrated their actual lives.