
The Persistence of Orientalism: Anglo-American Historians and Modern Egypt
Caroline Stone
Peter Gran
Syracuse UP, 2020
Intended for academics with specialized interests and not for general readers, this book criticizes the tendency of American and British scholars to perceive Egypt's political system in the 19th and 20th centuries as an example of stereotyped "Oriental Despotism" and for not taking a broader view of influences and developments, a subject worth exploring. He points out—correctly—that one country's view of another is often dictated by its own political agenda, at the expense of an objective analysis of facts, and therefore the traditional view of Egypt's evolution should be reconsidered. A controversial yet perfectly valid point. The book suffers at points with repetitiveness and lengthy criticisms of scholars (Arab as well as Western) tend to be waspish rather than constructive. The most interesting chapter is perhaps that in which he exhorts greater attention to the Ottoman roots of modern Egypt. As with other Syracuse University Press publications, the volume is nicely produced.
You may also be interested in...
Asma Khan’s Monsoon Cookbook Reclaims Taste of Home—Our Book Review
Known for her all-female kitchen at London’s Darjeeling Express, Asma Khan transforms her new cookbook into a memoir, steeped in nostalgia.Drawing New Conclusions About the Status of Women in Ancient Egypt
Egyptologist Mariam F. Ayad that gender bias among historians accounts for an underrepresentation of women’s lives in historical studies of Egypt.